Unsuspected Subclinical Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Post-COVID Patients: A Real-world Observation.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical myocardial dysfunction may exist in post-COVID-19 patients and may carry significance in long term. METHODOLOGY: Subjects of long-COVID-19 with historically and radiologically significant pulmonary involvement (without documented cardiac involvement) were evaluated on outpatient follow-up echocardiographically when they had disproportionate shortness of breath (SOB), fatigue, or high pulse rate as perceived by the physicians. The common acute-phase symptoms were noted and scored retrospectively. The assessment included spirometry and measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) score with measurement of the left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) free wall global longitudinal strain as an adjunct to routine two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and spirometry. The results were evaluated statistically with respect to the history of hospitalization. RESULTS: The hospitalized (n = 15) and nonhospitalized (n = 10) patients were demographically similar. However, the nonhospitalized patients had higher total symptom score (p = 0.03), anosmia (p = 0.017), and ageusia (p = 0.0019). At follow-up (>3 months of acute illness), the nonhospitalized patients had a better CAT score (p = 0.04), higher change in max pulse rate (p = 0.03), and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.002), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (p = 0.02), and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) (-17.15 ± 1.19 vs -13.11 ± 1.91) (p = 0.0001). Overall, the two groups formed distinct clusters. The LVGLS and the maximum pulse rate difference in the two chair test (2CT) seem to contribute maximally to the variance between the two groups in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The subclinical myocardial dysfunction persisting in post-COVID patients (without suspected cardiac affection and lower neuroinflammatory symptoms in the acute phase) with significant pulmonary affection needs further evaluation. They demonstrate a higher max pulse rate difference in the 2CT. This real-world observation demands further investigations.

Clinical profile and the extent of residual myocardial dysfunction among patients with previous coronavirus disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Many patients who have recovered from their coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) episode continue to remain symptomatic and seek medical opinion. The clinical characteristics and echocardiography findings of such subjects have not been adequately studied. METHODS: The study included 472 subjects (age 54.0 ± 13.4 years, 57% men) with previous COVID-19 (median duration since COVID-19 12.0 weeks, interquartile range 9.0-26.0 weeks) and 100 controls (age 53.9 ± 13.6 years, 53% men). All subjects underwent detailed clinical assessment and echocardiography, including measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). RESULTS: Less than third (29.2%) of the post-COVID subjects had needed hospitalization for their initial infection. Exertional dyspnea or breathing difficulty at rest were the commonest reasons for post-COVID presentation. As compared to controls, the post-COVID subjects had impaired LV systolic (LVEF 63.2 ± 2.2 vs. 61.9 ± 4.6, P = 0.007; GLS - 19.9 ± 2.6% vs. -17.6 ± 3.4%, P < 0.001) and diastolic function. Majority of those with reduced LV GLS had preserved LVEF. The patients presenting before 12 weeks were more likely to be symptomatic, but LV GLS did not differ. The patients needing hospitalization had higher burden of co-morbidities and significantly reduced LV GLS as compared to those who had received domiciliary treatment. The patients in the lowest GLS tertile were older, had higher burden of co-morbidities, and had had more severe initial infection with greater need for hospitalization, oxygen therapy and steroids. The need for hospitalization was independently associated with lower GLS at the time of current presentation. CONCLUSION: This study shows that impairment of LV systolic and diastolic function is common among subjects recovering from previous COVID-19 episode. The patients with more severe initial infection have more marked impairment of LV function and this impairment persists even after several months of recovery from the initial infection. Routine measurement of GLS may be helpful since LV systolic dysfunction in these patients is mostly subclinical.

Unsuspected Subclinical Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Post-COVID Patients: A Real-world Observation.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical myocardial dysfunction may exist in post-COVID-19 patients and may carry significance in long term. METHODOLOGY: Subjects of long-COVID-19 with historically and radiologically significant pulmonary involvement (without documented cardiac involvement) were evaluated on outpatient follow-up echocardiographically when they had disproportionate shortness of breath (SOB), fatigue, or high pulse rate as perceived by the physicians. The common acute-phase symptoms were noted and scored retrospectively. The assessment included spirometry and measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) score with measurement of the left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) free wall global longitudinal strain as an adjunct to routine two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and spirometry. The results were evaluated statistically with respect to the history of hospitalization. RESULTS: The hospitalized (n = 15) and nonhospitalized (n = 10) patients were demographically similar. However, the nonhospitalized patients had higher total symptom score (p = 0.03), anosmia (p = 0.017), and ageusia (p = 0.0019). At follow-up (>3 months of acute illness), the nonhospitalized patients had a better CAT score (p = 0.04), higher change in max pulse rate (p = 0.03), and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (p = 0.002), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (p = 0.02), and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) (-17.15 ± 1.19 vs -13.11 ± 1.91) (p = 0.0001). Overall, the two groups formed distinct clusters. The LVGLS and the maximum pulse rate difference in the two chair test (2CT) seem to contribute maximally to the variance between the two groups in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The subclinical myocardial dysfunction persisting in post-COVID patients (without suspected cardiac affection and lower neuroinflammatory symptoms in the acute phase) with significant pulmonary affection needs further evaluation. They demonstrate a higher max pulse rate difference in the 2CT. This real-world observation demands further investigations.